Gêmeos digitais aplicados ao patrimônio cultural
proposta metodológica para um observatório nacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5016/pem.v22.e4185Keywords:
preservação do patrimônio cultural, H-BIM-SIG, Observatório Nacional do Patrimônio Cultural, protocolo nacionalAbstract
Digital Twins are a technological advance in the documentation and management of cultural heritage conservation, allowing for preventive diagnostics of listed properties. However, in Brazil, the lack of national protocols limits the institutional adoption of this sustainable practice. This article aims to propose a methodology for the creation of a National Cultural Heritage Observatory, based on the use of Digital Heritage Twins as a tool to support the preservation, conservation management, and dissemination of Brazilian cultural heritage. The methodological model is divided into nine phases, ranging from the definition of requirements and data collection to Heritage Building Information Modeling, Geographic Information System, monitoring, sustainable management, cultural mediation, and validation of Digital Heritage Twins on a national scale. As a result, the model integrates technical, regulatory, and sociocultural dimensions, and its application enables the consolidation of a National Protocol for Digital Documentation and Monitoring, ensuring standardization and interoperability. It can be concluded that the methodological proposal of the National Cultural Heritage Observatory represents an innovation capable of positioning Brazil at the forefront of international debates on digital heritage, while responding to local demands for preservation, conservation, governance, and cultural appreciation.
References
ABNT. Construção de edificação: organização de informação da construção: parte 2: estrutura para classificação. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2018.
ABNT. Sistema de classificação da informação da construção: parte 1: terminologia e estrutura. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2011.
ADAMOPOULOS, E. et al. Multispectral sensing and data integration for the study of heritage architecture. Engineering Proceedings, v. 2, n. 1, p. 64, nov. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-7-08198.
ARMIJO, A.; ZAMORA-SÁNCHEZ, D. Integration of railway bridge structural health monitoring into the internet of things with a digital twin: a case study. Sensors, v. 24, n. 7, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24072115.
BARZAGHI, S. et al. From metadata to storytelling: a framework for 3D cultural
heritage visualization on RDF data. ArXiv, v. 1, May 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.14328.
BHATTA, S.; DANG, J. Use of IoT for structural health monitoring of civil engineering structures: a state‑of‑the‑art review. Urban Lifeline, v. 2, n. 17, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44285-024-00031-2.
BOBOC, R. G. et al. Augmented reality in cultural heritage: an overview of the last decade of applications. Applied Sciences, v. 12, n. 19, p. 9859, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199859.
BOJE, C. et al. Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction, v. 114, p. 103179, June 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179.
BRUMANA, R.; IOANNIDES, M.; PREVITALI, M. Holistic Heritage Building Information Modelling (HHBIM): from nodes to hub networking, vocabularies and repositories. In: THE INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF THE PHOTOGRAMMETRY, REMOTE SENSING AND SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCES. Proceedings […]. [S. l.], 2019. v. 42. p. 309-316. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2/W11-309-2019.
CAPECCHI, I. et al. Augmented reality and serious game to engage the alpha generation in urban cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, v. 66, p. 523-535, Mar./Apr. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2024.01.004.
DORE, C.; MURPHY, M. Integration of Historic Building Information Modeling (HBIM) and 3D GIS for recording and managing cultural heritage sites. In: INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF THE PHOTOGRAMMETRY, REMOTE SENSING AND SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCES, 18., 2012, Milan. Proceedings [...]. Milan: [s. n.], 2012. p. 613-619, 2012. Disponível em: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1072&context=beschreccon. Acesso em: 26 out. 2025.
DUVAL, R. A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, v. 61, n. 1-2, p. 103–131, 2006. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z. Acesso em: 30 out. 2025.
ECO, H. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976.
FELICETTI, A.; HIMMICHE, A.; SOMENZI, M. Knowledge graphs and artificial intelligence for the implementation of cognitive heritage digital twins. Applied Sciences, Basel, v. 15, n. 18, p. 10061, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810061.
FELICETTI, A.; NICCOLUCCI, F. Artificial intelligence and ontologies for the management of heritage digital twins data. Data, v. 10, n. 1, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810061.
FRONER, Y. A. et al. Data Collection for Cultural Heritage Risk Management: the Damage Map through Heritage Building Information Modeling (HBIM) Project Applied to the Façade of St Francis of Assisi, Ouro Preto, Brazil. Studies in Conservation, v. 69, supl. 1, p. 98-107, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2024.2379132.
GUO, Y. et al. Extending X‑reality technologies to digital twin in cultural heritage risk management: a comparative evaluation from the perspective of situation awareness. Heritage Science, v. 12, n. 245, p. 1-22, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01363-6.
ICCROM. A guide to risk management of cultural heritage. Rome: ICCROM, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/Guide-to-Risk-Managment_English.pdf. Acesso em: 26 out. 2025.
ICOMOS. Carta ICOMOS para interpretación y presentación de sitios de patrimonio cultural: preparado bajo los auspicios del comité científico internacional del ICOMOS sobre la interpretación y presentación de sitios de patrimonio cultural Ratificada por la 16ªAsamblea General del ICOMOS. Québec, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.icomos-teoria.org/_files/ugd/eff5d8_1ea8e303ef164866a5451064d0816942.pdf. Acesso em: 30 out. 2025.
ICOMOS. Guidance on heritage impact assessments for Cultural World Heritage properties. Paris: ICOMOS, 2011.
IUCN. Management planning for natural world heritage properties: a resource manual for practitioners. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Programme on Protected Areas, 2008. Disponível em: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/whmanagement.pdf. Acesso em: 30 out. 2025.
IPEA. Agenda 2030: objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável: avaliação do progresso das principais metas globais para o Brasil: ODS 11: tornar as cidades e os assentamentos humanos inclusivos, seguros, resilientes e sustentáveis. Brasília, DF: Ipea, 2024. (Cadernos ODS, 11). Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.38116/ri2024ODS11. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
MOROPOULOU, A. et al. Multispectral applications of infrared thermography in the diagnosis and protection of built cultural heritage. Applied Sciences, v. 8, n. 2, p. 284, Feb. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app8020284.
MURPHY, M.; MCGOVERN, E.; PAVIA, S. Historic Building Information Modelling (HBIM). Structural Survey, v. 27, n. 4, p. 311-327, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800910985108.
NEX, F.; REMONDINO, F. UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review. Applied Geomatics, v. 6, p. 1-15, 2014.
PAVLIDIS, G. Agentic ai for cultural heritage: embedding risk memory in semantic digital twins. Computers, Basel, v. 14, n. 7, p. 266, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/14/7/266. Acesso em: 27 out. 2025.
RAMTOHUL, A.; KHEDO, K. K. Augmented reality systems in the cultural heritage domains: a systematic review. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, v. 32, e00317, Mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2024.e00317.
SHANG, X. et al. Behavioral model construction of architectural heritage for digital twin. Heritage Science, v. 13, n. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-025-01691-1. Acesso em: 26 out. 2025.
SUGIYAMA, G.; BOURGEOIS, I.; RODRIGUES, H. A holistic methodology for the assessment of heritage digital twin applied to portuguese case studies. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, v. 36, e00390, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2024.e00390.
TAKE BIM Processes to the next level with Digital Twins. Building SMART, c2025. Disponível em: https://www.buildingsmart.org/take-bim-processes-to-the-next-level-with-digital-twins/. Acesso em: 30 out. 2025.
TEJEDOR, B. et al. Non-destructive techniques (NDT) for the diagnosis of heritage buildings: Traditional procedures and future perspectives. Energy and Buildings, v. 263, p. 112029, May 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112029.
UNESCO. World Heritage Convention and sustainable development. Paris, 2011. Disponível em: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2011/whc11-35com-5Ee.pdf. Acesso em: 30 out. 2025.
WANG, G. et al. Research on value-chain-driven multi-level digital twin models for architectural heritage. Buildings, v. 15, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15172984
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 José Edeson de Melo Siqueira, Max Lira Veras Xavier de Andrade, André Gustavo da Silva Bezerra Lins, Francisco Luiz dos Santos, Sílvio de Barros Melo, Murilo Artur Araújo da Silveira , Daniela Eugênia Moura de Albuquerque

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All the content of the journal, except where noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons BY attribution license.