Gêmeos digitais aplicados ao patrimônio cultural
proposta metodológica para um observatório nacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5016/pem.v22.e4185Palabras clave:
preservação do patrimônio cultural, H-BIM-SIG, Observatório Nacional do Patrimônio Cultural, protocolo nacionalResumen
Los gemelos digitales son un avance tecnológico en la documentación y gestión de la conservación del patrimonio cultural, ya que permiten realizar diagnósticos preventivos de los bienes catalogados. Sin embargo, en Brasil, la falta de protocolos nacionales limita la adopción institucional de esta práctica sostenible. El presente artículo tiene como objetivo proponer una metodología para la creación de un Observatorio Nacional del Patrimonio Cultural, basado en el uso de gemelos digitales del patrimonio como herramienta de apoyo a la preservación, la gestión de la conservación y la difusión del patrimonio cultural brasileño. El modelo metodológico se divide en nueve fases, que van desde la definición de requisitos y la recopilación de datos hasta el modelado de información de edificios patrimoniales, el sistema de información geográfica, el seguimiento, la gestión sostenible, la mediación cultural y la validación de gemelos digitales del patrimonio a escala nacional. Como resultado, el modelo integra dimensiones técnicas, normativas y socioculturales, y su aplicación permite la consolidación de un Protocolo Nacional de Documentación y Monitoreo Digital, garantizando la estandarización y la interoperabilidad. Se puede concluir que la propuesta metodológica del Observatorio Nacional del Patrimonio Cultural representa una innovación capaz de posicionar a Brasil a la vanguardia de los debates internacionales sobre el patrimonio digital, al tiempo que responde a las demandas locales de preservación, conservación, gobernanza y apreciación cultural.
Citas
ABNT. Construção de edificação: organização de informação da construção: parte 2: estrutura para classificação. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2018.
ABNT. Sistema de classificação da informação da construção: parte 1: terminologia e estrutura. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2011.
ADAMOPOULOS, E. et al. Multispectral sensing and data integration for the study of heritage architecture. Engineering Proceedings, v. 2, n. 1, p. 64, nov. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-7-08198.
ARMIJO, A.; ZAMORA-SÁNCHEZ, D. Integration of railway bridge structural health monitoring into the internet of things with a digital twin: a case study. Sensors, v. 24, n. 7, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24072115.
BARZAGHI, S. et al. From metadata to storytelling: a framework for 3D cultural
heritage visualization on RDF data. ArXiv, v. 1, May 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.14328.
BHATTA, S.; DANG, J. Use of IoT for structural health monitoring of civil engineering structures: a state‑of‑the‑art review. Urban Lifeline, v. 2, n. 17, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44285-024-00031-2.
BOBOC, R. G. et al. Augmented reality in cultural heritage: an overview of the last decade of applications. Applied Sciences, v. 12, n. 19, p. 9859, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199859.
BOJE, C. et al. Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction, v. 114, p. 103179, June 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179.
BRUMANA, R.; IOANNIDES, M.; PREVITALI, M. Holistic Heritage Building Information Modelling (HHBIM): from nodes to hub networking, vocabularies and repositories. In: THE INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF THE PHOTOGRAMMETRY, REMOTE SENSING AND SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCES. Proceedings […]. [S. l.], 2019. v. 42. p. 309-316. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2/W11-309-2019.
CAPECCHI, I. et al. Augmented reality and serious game to engage the alpha generation in urban cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, v. 66, p. 523-535, Mar./Apr. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2024.01.004.
DORE, C.; MURPHY, M. Integration of Historic Building Information Modeling (HBIM) and 3D GIS for recording and managing cultural heritage sites. In: INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF THE PHOTOGRAMMETRY, REMOTE SENSING AND SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCES, 18., 2012, Milan. Proceedings [...]. Milan: [s. n.], 2012. p. 613-619, 2012. Disponível em: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1072&context=beschreccon. Acesso em: 26 out. 2025.
DUVAL, R. A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, v. 61, n. 1-2, p. 103–131, 2006. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z. Acesso em: 30 out. 2025.
ECO, H. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976.
FELICETTI, A.; HIMMICHE, A.; SOMENZI, M. Knowledge graphs and artificial intelligence for the implementation of cognitive heritage digital twins. Applied Sciences, Basel, v. 15, n. 18, p. 10061, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810061.
FELICETTI, A.; NICCOLUCCI, F. Artificial intelligence and ontologies for the management of heritage digital twins data. Data, v. 10, n. 1, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810061.
FRONER, Y. A. et al. Data Collection for Cultural Heritage Risk Management: the Damage Map through Heritage Building Information Modeling (HBIM) Project Applied to the Façade of St Francis of Assisi, Ouro Preto, Brazil. Studies in Conservation, v. 69, supl. 1, p. 98-107, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2024.2379132.
GUO, Y. et al. Extending X‑reality technologies to digital twin in cultural heritage risk management: a comparative evaluation from the perspective of situation awareness. Heritage Science, v. 12, n. 245, p. 1-22, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01363-6.
ICCROM. A guide to risk management of cultural heritage. Rome: ICCROM, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/Guide-to-Risk-Managment_English.pdf. Acesso em: 26 out. 2025.
ICOMOS. Carta ICOMOS para interpretación y presentación de sitios de patrimonio cultural: preparado bajo los auspicios del comité científico internacional del ICOMOS sobre la interpretación y presentación de sitios de patrimonio cultural Ratificada por la 16ªAsamblea General del ICOMOS. Québec, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.icomos-teoria.org/_files/ugd/eff5d8_1ea8e303ef164866a5451064d0816942.pdf. Acesso em: 30 out. 2025.
ICOMOS. Guidance on heritage impact assessments for Cultural World Heritage properties. Paris: ICOMOS, 2011.
IUCN. Management planning for natural world heritage properties: a resource manual for practitioners. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Programme on Protected Areas, 2008. Disponível em: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/whmanagement.pdf. Acesso em: 30 out. 2025.
IPEA. Agenda 2030: objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável: avaliação do progresso das principais metas globais para o Brasil: ODS 11: tornar as cidades e os assentamentos humanos inclusivos, seguros, resilientes e sustentáveis. Brasília, DF: Ipea, 2024. (Cadernos ODS, 11). Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.38116/ri2024ODS11. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
MOROPOULOU, A. et al. Multispectral applications of infrared thermography in the diagnosis and protection of built cultural heritage. Applied Sciences, v. 8, n. 2, p. 284, Feb. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app8020284.
MURPHY, M.; MCGOVERN, E.; PAVIA, S. Historic Building Information Modelling (HBIM). Structural Survey, v. 27, n. 4, p. 311-327, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800910985108.
NEX, F.; REMONDINO, F. UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review. Applied Geomatics, v. 6, p. 1-15, 2014.
PAVLIDIS, G. Agentic ai for cultural heritage: embedding risk memory in semantic digital twins. Computers, Basel, v. 14, n. 7, p. 266, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/14/7/266. Acesso em: 27 out. 2025.
RAMTOHUL, A.; KHEDO, K. K. Augmented reality systems in the cultural heritage domains: a systematic review. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, v. 32, e00317, Mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2024.e00317.
SHANG, X. et al. Behavioral model construction of architectural heritage for digital twin. Heritage Science, v. 13, n. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-025-01691-1. Acesso em: 26 out. 2025.
SUGIYAMA, G.; BOURGEOIS, I.; RODRIGUES, H. A holistic methodology for the assessment of heritage digital twin applied to portuguese case studies. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, v. 36, e00390, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2024.e00390.
TAKE BIM Processes to the next level with Digital Twins. Building SMART, c2025. Disponível em: https://www.buildingsmart.org/take-bim-processes-to-the-next-level-with-digital-twins/. Acesso em: 30 out. 2025.
TEJEDOR, B. et al. Non-destructive techniques (NDT) for the diagnosis of heritage buildings: Traditional procedures and future perspectives. Energy and Buildings, v. 263, p. 112029, May 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112029.
UNESCO. World Heritage Convention and sustainable development. Paris, 2011. Disponível em: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2011/whc11-35com-5Ee.pdf. Acesso em: 30 out. 2025.
WANG, G. et al. Research on value-chain-driven multi-level digital twin models for architectural heritage. Buildings, v. 15, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15172984
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 José Edeson de Melo Siqueira, Max Lira Veras Xavier de Andrade, André Gustavo da Silva Bezerra Lins, Francisco Luiz dos Santos, Sílvio de Barros Melo, Murilo Artur Araújo da Silveira , Daniela Eugênia Moura de Albuquerque

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Todo el contenido de la revista, salvo que se indique lo contrario, está sujeto a una licencia de atribución Creative Commons BY.